Retrospective pilot study demonstrates high diagnostic agreement between PainVision and Neurometer in oromaxillofacial hypoesthesia, indicating potential for quantitative sensory testing.
Iatrogenic injuries to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during dental procedures require objective sensory evaluation. While the Neurometer is established for oromaxillofacial physical evaluation, PainVision is a novel device that measures pain equivalent current. However, its reference values are limited to extremities, with none established for the oromaxillofacial region. This retrospective pilot study evaluated the practical utility of PainVision by comparing its current perception threshold (CPT) with the Neurometer, aiming to determine preliminary cut-off values for diagnosing hypoesthesia. We measured and compared CPTs between affected and contralateral normal sites in 32 patients with unilateral sensory alterations using both devices. CPT values at the affected site were significantly higher across all measurements (P<0.001). PainVision CPT showed significant positive correlations with all three Neurometer frequencies, peaking at 5 Hz (r=0.512, P=0.003). The optimal cutoff value for diagnosing hypoesthesia was 19.1 μA (area under the curve, 0.877; sensitivity, 93.8%, specificity, 81.2%). The diagnostic agreement between devices was 87.5% (к=0.750). In conclusion, PainVision demonstrates high diagnostic agreement with the Neurometer, suggesting its potential utility as a quantitative sensory testing tool in the oromaxillofacial region. These findings lay a crucial foundation for future large-scale investigations to establish definitive diagnostic frameworks for oromaxillofacial physical evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: