Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spatial modeling analysis reveals distinct effects of nighttime light and building volume on vegetation phenology across 30 cities, suggesting tailored targets for climate-adaptive urban planning.
Urbanization reshapes vegetation phenology through interacting environmental pathways, yet the individual and combined associations of local urban-development characteristics with phenological dynamics remain unresolved. Here, we develop the Local Urban Development Intensity Characteristics (LUDICs) framework, integrating nighttime-light intensity (NTL), the blue-to-red light ratio (BRR), and building volume (BV). The framework extends urban phenology assessment from broad spatial contrasts to component-specific analysis of phenological timing, spatial coherence, and future responses across climatic settings. Using satellite-derived phenology, nighttime-light imagery, and building data for 30 Chinese cities, we combined spatial statistics and covariate-adjusted partial correlations with interpretable machine-learning analysis. An eight-scenario factorial design evaluated the individual and combined effects of LUDICs under three socioeconomic pathways for 2030–2100. Urban areas exhibited lower spatial coherence of growing-season length than surrounding non-urban areas, with 53.7% of discontinuity hotspots located along urban–non-urban edges. In monsoon-dominated cities, higher BRR was associated with longer growing seasons, whereas higher NTL and BV were associated with shorter seasons; BRR and NTL showed opposite associations in continental-dominated cities. LUDICs accounted for 20.4–31.4% of model-explained phenological variation. Model interpretation revealed threshold-like shifts for BRR and NTL, whereas BV contributions gradually changed from positive to negative and strengthened toward both extremes. NTL-inclusive scenarios produced the largest projected changes, while the established LUDIC background accounted for most late-century responses. These findings provide a component-specific basis for evaluating urban-development alternatives and support climate-adaptive planning and environmental assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: