Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds equivalent cognitive behavioral therapy efficacy regardless of caffeine intake in chronic insomnia, suggesting caffeine guidance may optimize perceived sleep quality.
Objectives: Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia; however, individual responses vary. Although caffeine disrupts sleep, its effect on CBT-I outcomes remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between caffeine consumption and efficacy of CBT-I.Methods: This retrospective study included 37 adults with chronic insomnia who completed a standardized 4-week CBT-I program. The participants were classified into the caffeine (n=19) and non-caffeine (n=18) groups. Insomnia severity and sleep quality were assessed before treatment and 2 weeks after completion using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).Results: CBT-I significantly improved ISI and PSQI scores over time in both groups (p<0.001). No significant group differences or Group×Time interactions were observed for overall insomnia severity or sleep quality, indicating comparable treatment efficacy, regardless of caffeine intake. Treatment response rates, defined by clinically meaningful reductions in ISI (>7 points) or PSQI (≥3 points), did not differ between groups. However, the caffeine group consistently reported poorer subjective sleep quality and greater daytime dysfunction than the non-caffeine group at both time points.Conclusions: CBT-I effectively improved insomnia severity and sleep quality irrespective of daily caffeine consumption. While caffeine intake does not appear to reduce the overall CBT-I efficacy, persistent subjective sleep impairment and daytime dysfunction among caffeine consumers suggest that individualized caffeine education may help optimize perceived treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: