Experimental investigation reveals that lower water–cement ratios increase compressive strength in laterite–cement mixtures, highlighting the importance of soil properties for block durability.
This study investigates the influence of the nominal water–cement (W/C) ratio and laterite particle-size characteristics on the workability, compaction behaviour, and compressive strength of laterite–cement mixtures produced from soils obtained from Agu Awka and Umueri in Anambra State, Nigeria. The experimental programme employed a 1:6 cement-to-laterite proportion and W/C ratios of 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, and 0.55. Laboratory investigations included particle-size distribution, compaction characteristics, Atterberg limits, slump, compressive strength at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, and water absorption. The results showed that the Agu Awka soil attained a substantially higher maximum dry unit weight of 18.63 kN/m³ compared with 13.42 kN/m³ for the Umueri soil, while the corresponding optimum moisture contents were approximately 12.8% and 13.8%, respectively. The Agu Awka soil also exhibited lower plasticity, with a liquid limit (LL) of 25.0% and plasticity index (PI) of 7.73%, compared with an LL of 42.0% and PI of 16.3% for the Umueri soil. Slump increased consistently with increasing W/C ratio, rising from approximately 2.4–2.5 mm at W/C = 0.30 to about 20.1–20.3 mm at W/C = 0.55. In contrast, the mean 28-day compressive strength decreased from 3.43 MPa at W/C = 0.30 to 1.37 MPa at W/C = 0.55. Water absorption also decreased as the W/C ratio increased.The findings demonstrate that the source and particle-size characteristics of laterite can significantly influence the compaction behaviour and moisture requirements of laterite–cement mixtures. The study further concludes that, where adequate compaction is achieved, lower W/C ratios can contribute to higher compressive strength in laterite–cement blocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okoli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: