Cross-sectional study demonstrates structural validity of a goal-setting scale in subacute rehabilitation clients, suggesting caution due to substantial ceiling effects.
PURPOSE: To develop a Japanese version of the Client-Centredness of Goal Setting (C-COGS) scale and examine its measurement properties. METHODS: A convenience sample of 111 clients in four Japanese subacute rehabilitation wards participated in this cross-sectional psychometric study. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC), convergent validity (correlation with the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire; SDM-Q-9), and structural validity (confirmatory factor analysis) were assessed. Most fit indices supported the two-factor model (robust CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.961, SRMR = 0.058), although RMSEA (0.070) exceeded the cutoff; a WLSMV sensitivity analysis supported the same structure with poorer fit (RMSEA = 0.099). Ceiling effects exceeded the 15% criterion for all items, subscales, and the total score (30.6-74.8%); floor effects were not indicated. CONCLUSION: The Japanese C-COGS showed preliminary evidence for the properties examined. Content validity, responsiveness, known-groups validity, and measurement invariance remain to be established, and ceiling effects warrant caution in interpreting absolute scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: