Modeling study demonstrates 15% water loss reductions in a large-scale agricultural irrigation system, indicating favorable long-term viability for canal-to-pipeline conversion.
Existing canal system losses are addressed through a six-step modernisation framework, producing optimised pressurised pipeline layouts with water savings, energy savings and renewable energy recovery. Agricultural irrigation is the largest consumer of freshwater worldwide, with traditional open-channel systems incurring substantial water losses and inefficient energy use, particularly in water-scarce regions. This study explores the modernisation of gravity-fed bulk irrigation canals into pressurised pipeline networks as an innovative water conservation strategy aimed at improving efficiency, reliability and long-term water security. A structured evaluation framework integrating hydraulic modelling, water-loss reduction, energy assessment and economic analysis was developed to support decision-making for potential irrigation scheme upgrades. The framework was applied to a large-scale agricultural irrigation system using GIS-based spatial analysis and network simulations to evaluate multiple pipeline alignments and operational scenarios. Results show that pressurised conveyance can reduce water losses by approximately 15%, improve pressure regulation, flow control and lower energy requirements where pumping is employed. Opportunities for energy recovery in high-pressure zones further enhance system efficiency. Despite higher investment costs compared to rehabilitating the existing system, lifecycle analysis indicates favourable long-term economic performance due to water savings, reduced energy use and improved operational control. The study demonstrates that canal-to-pipeline conversion is a practical and scalable approach for sustainable agricultural water management under increasing water scarcity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: