Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series demonstrates functional recovery using contralateral facial artery chimeric flaps in elderly pre-frail oral cancer patients, suggesting an effective alternative to free flap surgery.
Background Large oral cavity defects after oncologic ablation require reliable reconstruction to restore oral function and aesthetics. Although free flap reconstruction remains a standard option, it may be unsuitable for elderly pre-frail patients with multiple comorbidities. This report describes a contralateral facial artery-based chimeric flap combining a nasolabial island flap and a submental artery island flap for reconstruction of large oral cavity defects. Case presentation Two elderly pre-frail patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth underwent wide local excision, resulting in moderately large soft-tissue defects involving the tongue and floor of the mouth. The defects could not be adequately reconstructed using either a nasolabial island flap or a submental artery island flap alone. A contralateral facial artery-based chimeric flap was therefore designed to provide sufficient local tissue volume while avoiding microvascular anastomosis. All donor-site incisions were closed primarily, and no immediate donor-site wound complications occurred. At approximately 1 year of follow-up, both patients demonstrated acceptable oral intake and overall functional recovery; however, mild cheek depression, persistent partial facial paralysis in Case 2, and intraoral hair growth in the male patient were observed. Conclusions A contralateral facial artery-based chimeric flap composed of a nasolabial island flap and a submental artery island flap may be a useful reconstructive option for large oral cavity defects, particularly in elderly pre-frail patients who may be unsuitable candidates for free flap reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: