Comparative mapping study reveals line transects overestimate carbonate production in Caribbean reef spurs, indicating conventional surveys mask critical spatial heterogeneity.
Traditional methods for estimating calcium carbonate production on coral reefs rely on in-water line transects that sample only a fraction of the reefscape, inherently introducing spatial biases and under-representing the heterogeneity of coral assemblages. Here, we diagnose how these spatial assumptions influence carbonate production estimates by comparing line transects with full-spur, plan-view mapping derived from structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Three entire reef spurs (ca 850 m² total) within a highly degraded Caribbean reefscape were mapped to quantify coral cover, species composition and gross calcium carbonate production. Full-spur mapping revealed lower but more representative mean coral cover and production than conventional transects, indicating systematic overestimation driven by transect placement and reefscape-structure effects associated with partial spatial sampling (i.e. the spatial configuration of edges, flanks and gaps that can be under-represented by conventional and low-density transect sampling designs). While transect-derived averages masked heterogeneity into near-homogeneous, higher-mean matrices, full-spur mapping resolved strongly patchy production, with small, low-cover patches concentrating a disproportionate share of output amid extensive low-production areas. By coupling spatial structure with process at the scale of natural reef units, this framework exposes hidden biases in long-standing monitoring practices and strengthens the foundations for predicting geomorphic persistence in an era of accelerating reef decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molina‐Hernández et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: