Why the study?
Heart failure remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure with an increasing global burden, alongside an accelerating pace of scientific progress across epidemiology, diagnostics, and management.
Design
Review
Key result
Recent advances in heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics support a transition toward a more personalized and biologically informed model of care.
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The mildly reduced LVEF phenotype was introduced in previous guidelines to focus on patients not usually included in clinical trials. Education and lifestyle advice empower patients to manage their heart failure and engage in shared decision-making.”
“There's a reclassification of the nomenclature. We're not using any more reduced or mildly reduced or preserved rejection fraction, we're now going reduce EF less than 50% ejection fraction or preserve ejection fraction more than 50%. Also, there is a new nomenclature for drug therapies... we're not seeing any more guideline or medical therapy, there's now foundational medical therapies.”
May guide future personalized HF strategies; leaves open the need for prospective validation across phenotypes.
Recent advances in heart failure epidemiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics support a transition towards a more personalized and biologically informed model of care across the entire HF spectrum.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
A comprehensive review summarizing recent major advances in heart failure therapies and diagnostics, serving as a key reference for clinicians.
Liguori et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. Recent advances in heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics support a transition toward a more personalized and biologically informed model of care.