Key result
CIED strategies vary widely by age, with epicardial leads persisting in pediatric patients.
Why the study?
Nationwide epidemiological studies of CIEDs encompassing multiple device types and strategies remain limited in Japan, especially regarding epicardial lead use and pediatric populations.
Observational
CIED strategies in Japan demonstrate significant age-dependent variation, with epicardial systems remaining essential in pediatric care while alternative technologies like leadless pacemakers and S-ICDs are increasingly adopted in older populations.
Age-specific CIED planning warrants consideration in Japan; leaves open prospective outcome comparisons across strategies and age groups.
Background Nationwide epidemiological studies of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) encompassing multiple device types and strategies remain limited in Japan, particularly regarding epicardial lead use and pediatric populations. Methods We performed the first nationwide analysis of CIED implantation trends using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims, including transvenous (TV)/epicardial (Epi) systems for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and CRT‐defibrillators (CRTDs), as well as leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous ICDs (S‐ICDs), and epicardial lead use. Epicardial lead and pediatric characteristics were supplemented using industry data. Results In fiscal year 2023, implantation rates per 100 000 population were 29.69 for TV‐pacemakers, 7.06 for leadless pacemakers, 2.42 for TV‐ICDs, 0.889 for S‐ICDs, 1.20 for TV‐CRT, and 1.69 for TV‐CRTDs. Rates for epicardial systems were lower, at 0.173 for Epi‐pacemakers, 0–0.007 for Epi‐ICDs, 0.024 for Epi‐CRT, and 0.027 for Epi‐CRTDs, while epicardial lead use was 0.545. S‐ICD use increased across age groups, whereas TV‐ICD implantation declined (all p < 0.001). Implantation of TV and leadless pacemakers, TV‐CRT, and TV‐CRTDs increased over time (all p < 0.001). Epicardial lead use showed a bimodal age distribution, peaking in pediatric and elderly populations, and declined in older adults while remaining stable in children and adults aged 20–49 years ( p < 0.001). Pediatric CIED volumes were low, with several ICD, CRT, and CRTD procedures annually. Conclusions CIED strategies in Japan demonstrate age‐dependent variation. Epicardial systems remain indispensable in pediatric and congenital heart disease care, whereas alternative technologies are increasingly adopted in older adult populations, reflecting evolving lifespan‐related device strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation was evaluated on Implantation rates per 100,000 population and temporal trends. Cardiac implantable electronic device strategies in Japan demonstrate age-dependent variation, with epicardial systems remaining indispensable in pediatric care and alternative technologies increasingly adopted in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: