Geometric analysis demonstrates exact zero-curvature sets of Cheeger deformations on Riemannian products, highlighting pathways to positive curvature in eight dimensions.
Cheeger deformations are the principal source of nonnegatively curved metrics, and the size of the set of zero-curvature planes they leave behind decides whether the curvature can be pushed all the way to positive. This paper determines that set exactly for Riemannian products carrying a diagonal group action. For a diagonal action of a compact group of rank one, the zero-curvature planes of the Cheeger deformation are precisely the projectivisation of the intersection of the two vertical images, transported by Cheeger's endomorphism, so that their dimension is dim V1 + dim V2 − d − 1, where d is the orbit dimension. This recovers Müter's classical computation for S2×S2, including its exceptional set, and identifies the flat set of S3×S3 as a projective plane. In higher rank the count is governed by Richardson's commuting variety. For CP2×CP2 with the diagonal SU(3) the flat set has dimension 7 − d, and the orbit dimension is 7 away from the codimension-two locus of orthogonal pairs of lines, 6 on it, and 4 on the diagonal: at every point of the open stratum the zero-curvature plane is isolated. The plane is exhibited explicitly over the rationals, and its isolation is the statement that an explicit 12×12 rational Hessian has rank 12, verified by the Lean 4 kernel through a modular inverse certificate. Isolation makes the plane canonical, and the resulting two-plane distribution is integrable and totally geodesic: the open stratum is foliated by flat totally geodesic surfaces tangent to the zero-curvature planes, with the canonical frame at the constant angle arccos(2/3). Both geometric ingredients that the third-order mechanism of Brendle and Hung uses in dimension four are thus present in dimension eight. Complete code reproducing every computation, and the Lean 4 certificate, are included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zongmin Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: