Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study identifies four exploratory dietary profiles in university students, indicating that distinct food patterns lack stability and predictive reliability across countries.
Background: University students often report suboptimal dietary practices, but overall diet-quality scores may conceal differences in food-group consumption. This study explored whether distinguishable food-consumption profiles could be identified among university students from Chile, Mexico, Spain, and Italy, and examined, exploratorily, the characteristics associated with profile membership. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 686 university students completed a dietary assessment using nine component scores of the Healthy Eating Index adapted for the Spanish population (IASE). Profiles were derived by Ward’s hierarchical clustering with k-means refinement and assessed for split-half stability; Exhaustive CHAID explored characteristics associated with profile membership. Results: Internal validity indices favoured no candidate solution (silhouette 0.113–0.126 across two- to five-cluster solutions), and split-half stability was limited throughout, including for the retained four-cluster solution (mean Adjusted Rand Index = 0.30). Four profiles were nonetheless retained: Healthy and Prudent (24.8%), Low Plant-Food (13.0%), Mixed Dietary (36.6%), and Protein-Oriented (25.7%); all occurred in every country. Country was the first CHAID split, followed by living arrangement (Chile/Mexico), year of study (Spain), and post-pandemic PA change (Italy). The model did not outperform the majority-class baseline; the segmentation is therefore exploratory, not predictive. Conclusions: A four-cluster configuration could be derived in each setting, but validity and stability indices indicate it is not robust; country/academic-programme—confounded with institution—was the only characteristic with a non-negligible, though modest, association with profile membership. Findings are hypothesis-generating and require replication in larger, representative, longitudinal samples before profiles are treated as an established typology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: