Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey analysis reveals lower obesity prevalence from parent reports compared to measured data in adolescents, suggesting proxy reporting underestimates youth health risks.
Background: Previous comparison of obesity prevalence from the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) found differences between measured and parent-reported estimates for children and adolescents. The NSCH has undergone major methodological changes prompting re-examination of the correspondence between NSCH and NHANES obesity prevalence among children/adolescents ages 6–17 years. Objective: To compare obesity prevalence estimates among children/adolescents ages 6–17 years derived from parent-reported height/weight in NSCH (2016–2018) and measured height/weight in NHANES (2015–2018). Methods: Obesity prevalence, height, weight, and body-mass-index for age among children/adolescents ages 6–17 years from both surveys were compared by age, sex, and race/ethnicity using absolute and relative measures of difference. Results: Overall obesity prevalence was lower using parent-reported data than measured data (16.9% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01). Estimates were similar for children ages 6–11 years (19.1% vs. 19.5%) but reported estimates were lower for adolescents ages 12–17 years (14.8% vs. 20.8%), particularly among females ages 12–13 and males ages 14–15 years. Reported prevalence was generally similar or lower across racial/ethnic groups, except among non-Hispanic Black children ages 6–9 years. Reported height, weight, and body-mass-index were typically lower than measured values. Conclusions: Parent-reported data produced similar obesity estimates for children ages 6–11 years but underestimated adolescent obesity and should be interpreted cautiously, especially for detailed subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenney et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: