Econometric panel analysis reveals that geopolitical risk suppresses renewable energy consumption across 42 countries, highlighting an innovation-deployment gap that limits clean transition.
Purpose This paper aims to examine how the relationship between geopolitical risk and renewable energy consumption varies across the conditional distribution. It also assesses renewable-energy innovation as a partial channel and energy-exporter status as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach This study uses an annual panel of 42 countries from 1990 to 2021. The empirical strategy combines two-way fixed effects, system generalized method of moments, method-of-moments quantile regression, cross-sectional augmented distributed lag, augmented mean group, and common correlated effects mean group estimators, complemented by cross-quantile tests, a bootstrap innovation-channel decomposition, and exporter-specific marginal effects. Findings Geopolitical risk is negatively associated with renewable energy consumption across all estimators, with a stronger association at the upper quantiles. It is positively associated with renewable-energy patenting, although patenting is negatively related to consumption from the middle quantiles onward. The bootstrap decomposition indicates a significant but limited indirect association, consistent with an innovation–deployment gap. Energy-exporter status partly cushions the negative association, but this buffer weakens at higher quantiles. Originality/value This research identifies significant distributional heterogeneity in the geopolitical-risk association, distinguishes technological response from renewable-energy use, and shows that the buffering role of energy-exporter status varies across quantiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zambrano‐Monserrate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: