Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Constitutive modeling demonstrates accurate stress-strain response in anisotropic natural clays, indicating the viability of unified fabric and bonding evolution laws.
Naturally deposited clays generally exhibit interparticle bonding and fabric anisotropy, which provide additional strength beyond the remolded state and lead to direction-dependent mechanical responses. During loading, microstructural rearrangement, manifested as progressive bond breakage and fabric evolution, enhances energy dissipation and induces irreversible deformation, even when the stress state remains within the yield surface defined by the preconsolidation pressure. This study presents a thermodynamically consistent two-surface model for anisotropic natural clays, in which an enlarged and shifted outer surface represents the bonds-enhanced bounding surface, and an inner surface undergoes a kinematic hardening to capture the plastic deformation occurring within the outer surface. The model incorporates a fabric tensor from the anisotropic critical state theory (ACST) and two isotropic variables related to bonding, with modified evolution laws linked to plastic strain. This framework enables the model to capture the combined effect of bond degradation and fabric evolution on the macroscopic mechanical responses when the stress state lies within the overconsolidated regime. With only nine model parameters, the proposed formulation reproduces experimental results for three natural clays with high fidelity, successfully simulating smooth stress–strain curves, hysteresis loops, orientation-dependent behavior, and strength degradation under monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: