Key result
Diastolic stepping removes pulsatility oscillations but does not change mean MCAv versus free running.
Why the study?
During running, cerebral blood flow increases up to maximal exercise rather than showing the inverted-U response of cycling; the mechanisms driving this divergent response are unknown.
What mechanisms regulate cerebral perfusion during running exercise, and do foot strike-induced pulsatility oscillations or CO2 reactivity explain the progressive increase in MCAv?
What mechanisms regulate cerebral perfusion during running exercise, and do foot strike-induced pulsatility oscillations or CO2 reactivity explain the progressive increase in MCAv?
The progressive increase in middle cerebral artery velocity during running is facilitated by reduced responsiveness to hypocapnia related to prevailing arterial pressure, rather than foot strike-induced pulsatility oscillations.
Should not yet alter running gait recommendations; hypothesis-generating for pressure-dependent hypocapnic reactivity sustaining cerebral perfusion.
During running, cerebral blood flow (CBF) does not exhibit the inverted‐U response observed during cycling; instead, CBF increases up to maximal exercise, despite reductions in end‐tidal CO 2 (). The mechanism(s) driving this divergent response are unknown but may relate to foot strike‐induced pulsatility oscillations and/or reductions in cerebrovascular CO 2 reactivity (CVR). We assessed middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA v ), and MCA v pulsatility variability during an incremental running test ( n = 43) and fixed workload exercise under two conditions ( n = 17): (1) free running and (2) diastolic stepping, where the foot‐strike was synced to the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. CVR was assessed ( n = 12) at rest and during running. Young, healthy males and females exhibited progressive increases in the MCA v mean during incremental running (Females, Rest: 49.9 ± 11.3 cm s −1 , : 65.7 ± 11.7 cm s −1 ; Males, Rest: 45.9 ± 10.8 cm s −1 , : 67.1 ± 13.0 cm s −1 ; ANOVA P < 0.0001) despite reductions in at higher intensities (Females, Rest: 36.41 ± 5.1 mmHg, : 28.2 ± 5.1 mmHg; Males, Rest: 38.6 ± 4.5 mmHg; : 32.5 ± 9.0 mmHg; ANOVA P < 0.0001). Diastolic stepping removed pulsatility oscillations, reducing MCA v pulsatility variability (0.14 ± 0.04 mmHg), compared with free running (0.29 ± 0.09 mmHg, P < 0.0001). However, the MCA v mean was not different (56.1 ± 8.1 cm s −1 vs . 58.0 ± 8.7 cm s −1 ; P = 0.211). CVR to hypocapnia decreased from rest to running (−0.79 ± 0.44 vs . ‐0.19 ± 0.50 cm s −1 mmHg −1 ; P = 0.006). Additional experiments found that hypocapnic CVR progressively decreased with increasing exercise intensity (ANOVA P = 0.0065), related to the increase in arterial pressure, but was similar during running and cycling when arterial pressure was matched ( P = 0.999). These findings demonstrate that the CBF response during intense exercise is related to the prevailing arterial pressure and not modality per se , likely reflecting cerebrovascular vasoconstrictor reserve. image Key points Middle cerebral artery velocity (MCA v ) increases progressively during incremental running, contrasting with the inverted‐U response observed during cycling. We investigated whether this divergent response was explained by foot strike‐induced pulsatility oscillations or altered cerebrovascular CO 2 reactivity (CVR). Removing pulsatility oscillations, by synchronizing foot‐strike with the cardiac cycle, had no effect on the MCA v mean, indicating that pulsatility oscillations do not explain the continued increase in MCA v during running. In contrast, hypocapnic CVR was markedly attenuated during high‐intensity running. Follow‐up experiments demonstrated that hypocapnic vasoconstrictor reserve progressively declined with increasing exercise intensity and was related to the increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) but was similar during running and cycling when MAP was matched. These findings show that the progressive increase in MCA v during running is facilitated by a reduced responsiveness to hypocapnia, which appears related to the prevailing arterial pressure rather than modality per se . This attenuation likely reflects a reduced cerebrovascular vasoconstrictor reserve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simpson et al. (2026) studied Healthy (n=43). Diastolic stepping vs. Free running was evaluated on Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) mean (p=0.211). Diastolic stepping removed pulsatility oscillations but did not significantly change mean middle cerebral artery velocity compared with free running (56.1 vs 58.0 cm/s; P=0.211).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: