PURPOSE: With several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for increased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we wished to identify whether its use is necessary. TYPE OF STUDY: We performed a prospective randomized trial on 109 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had a tourniquet placed on the thigh and were assigned to either have it inflated or not inflated. Personal information, operative details, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to operative view, duration of operation, pain scores, analgesic requirements, or complications. The tourniquet required intraoperative inflation in 4 patients assigned not to have it inflated; in 1 patient, the tourniquet made no difference to the operative view. CONCLUSIONS: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourniquet routinely for knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear operative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our trial indicate that knee arthroscopy may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet. Therefore, we recommend that its routine use for this procedure is discontinued.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: