Key result
The multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay demonstrated 83% concordance with the singleplex method, detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 31% of samples compared to 41% with the singleplex assay.
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop a multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus in biological samples.
Does a multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay maintain diagnostic accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to the singleplex CDC protocol in nasopharyngeal samples?
Observational (n=334)
Does a multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay maintain diagnostic accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to the singleplex CDC protocol in nasopharyngeal samples?
Absolute Event Rate: 31% vs 41%
A multiplex RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 provides a fast, accurate, and lower-cost alternative to singleplex testing, achieving 93% sensitivity and 99% specificity.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objectives : This work aimed to develop a multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a biological sample. Methods : Multiplex Real-Time one-step RT-PCR was performed compared with the singleplex CDC protocol. For the detection of the N1 and N2 viral regions and host human RNase P gene, the fluorescent dyes VIC-BHQ-1, FAM-BHQ-1, and TAMRA-BHQ-2, respectively, were tested in a one-tube triplex reaction. The swabs from 334 nasopharyngeal samples were tested in comparisons with the singleplex method, and a pUC18 plasmid was constructed with concatenating regions from nucleocapsid and RNAse P gene as a positive control. Results : Paired data between the two assays presented a positive correlation. Comparative data demonstrated that the qRT-PCR multiplex was an efficient method presenting 83% of concordance with the singleplex, and the RNA from SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 31 and 41%, respectively. In addition, in 3% of the samples, the viral RNA was only detected in the multiplex. Conclusions : A fast, accurate, and low-cost method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 was obtained, highlighting the choice of conventional fluorophores and probes assisting in epidemiological surveillance and the clinical management of this serious public health disease.
Multiplex RT-PCR detects fewer positives than singleplex with 83% concordance; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucas et al. (2022) conducted an observational in COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection) (n=334). Multiplex Real-Time one-step RT-PCR assay vs. Singleplex CDC protocol was evaluated on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection rate. The multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR assay demonstrated 83% concordance with the singleplex method, detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 31% of samples compared to 41% with the singleplex assay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: