In Asia, it is still controversial whether it is safe to inject a contaminated animal bite wound with a foreign protein such as equine or human rabies immune globulin, even though this is recommended by the World Health Organization. A prospective study of 114 severe animal bite wounds which were injected with equine or human rabies immune globulin revealed an overall incidence of gross infection of 11.4%. No matched control group of patients bitten by animals whose wounds were not injected with immune globulin could be studied in this environment with a high prevalence of canine rabies. The incidence of wound infection in lacerations inflicted by sharp objects and sutured under local anaesthesia was therefore studied prospectively in 100 Thai patients from a similar socio-economic milieu; it was found to be 13%. Wound infection was more common in animal bites and lacerations of the lower extremities. It is concluded that injecting a properly cleansed bite wound with equine or human rabies immune globulin is a safe practice and should be performed whenever there is a possibility that the biting animal might have rabies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilde et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: