Key result
Moderate sedation during LAAO was associated with significant improvements in working memory (P=0.005) and processing speed (P=0.050) at 45 days, whereas general anesthesia showed no differences.
Why the study?
Intracardiac echocardiography guidance may avoid general anesthesia-associated cognitive impairment in elderly patients undergoing LAAO, but the effect of anesthesia method on cognitive function required study.
Does moderate sedation compared to general anesthesia improve cognitive function in patients undergoing LAAO?
Cohort (n=40)
Yes
Does moderate sedation compared to general anesthesia improve cognitive function in patients undergoing LAAO?
Moderate sedation during LAAO may preserve or improve long-term cognitive function metrics compared to general anesthesia.
Moderate sedation was associated with oculomotor cognitive gains post-LAAO unlike general anesthesia; leaves open differential effects in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography guidance has emerged as a feasible alternative to transesophageal echocardiography in guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). A proposed advantage of this approach is the avoidance of cognitive impairment associated with general anesthesia (GA) in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: We studied the effect of anesthesia method (GA vs moderate sedation [MS]) on cognitive function using a novel digital oculomotor biomarker. METHODS: Patients undergoing LAAO were prospectively enrolled at 2 medical centers (GA center and MS center). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline (V1), 6 hours post-LAAO (V2), and at 45 days (V3) using the ViewMind system, which consists of a head-mounted device with eye-tracking capabilities. We examined differences in cognitive function as measured by 2 oculomotor tests (Go/No Go and N-Back), within each group between V1 vs V2 and V1 vs V3. RESULTS: Forty patients (20 in each group: GA and MS) were enrolled. Patients in the MS group showed significant long-term (V1 vs V3) improvement in working memory (Δ n complete sequences, P = 0.005), processing speed (Δ n wrong fixations, P = 0.050), and sustained attention (gazing recognition (ms), P = 0.010), as measured by the N-Back task while there were no differences in the GA group (P = 0.180 for Δ n complete sequences, P = 0.410 for Δ n wrong fixations on hitbox, and P = 0.310 gazing recognition [msec]). CONCLUSIONS: Memory-based oculomotor metrics improved after the procedure in patients undergoing LAAO under MS but not within the GA group. This proof-of-concept study supports a differential impact of sedation strategies on cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing LAAO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sularz et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) (n=40). Moderate sedation vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on Change in working memory (Δ n complete sequences) from baseline to 45 days (p=0.005). Moderate sedation during LAAO was associated with significant improvements in working memory (P=0.005) and processing speed (P=0.050) at 45 days, whereas general anesthesia showed no differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: