Key result
Uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures resulted in 72.9% recovering daily living ability and 75.6% recovering walking ability at ≥2 years.
Why the study?
Does uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered, rectangular cross-section stem improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures?
Observational (n=37)
Does uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered, rectangular cross-section stem improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures?
Uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a double-tapered, rectangular cross-section stem provides good recovery of daily living and walking abilities in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results for elderly patients sustaining unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with an uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered, rectangular cross-section stem. Thirty-seven patients (21 females, 16 males; mean age 73.5 years, range 65-88 years) who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a standard (double-tapered, rectangular cross-section) uncemented stem were followed up for a minimum of two years. At final follow-up, 27 patients (72.9%) had recovered their daily living ability (Barthel index), and 28 patients (75.6%) had recovered all walking ability at a community level (Koval's category).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Unstable intertrochanteric fractures (n=37). Uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered, rectangular cross-section stem was evaluated on Recovery of daily living ability (Barthel index). Uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures resulted in 72.9% recovering daily living ability and 75.6% recovering walking ability at ≥2 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: