Surfaces of several styrene (St)−methyl methacrylate (MMA) random copolymers have been analyzed by ToF-SIMS and XPS in order to detect any possible surface segregation of one of the two components and/or any specific matrix effect in the fragmentation processes. The observed O/(O + C) dependency on styrene content observed by XPS indicates that styrene−methyl methacrylate copolymers exhibit bulklike surfaces over the entire composition range of the copolymer. The absolute intensity of characteristic peaks from styrene or methyl methacrylate units was monitored by ToF-SIMS as a function of the styrene content. In positive mode, hydrocarbon fragments such as CH 3 +, C 2 H 3 +, C 2 H 5 +, C 5 H 5 +, and C 7 H 9 + at m / z = 15, 27, 29, 65, and 93, respectively, decreased with increasing styrene content, while the intensities of MMA fragments decreased. All fragments exhibited intensity lower than that expected from a simple linear combination calculated from intensities associated with the MMA and St homopolymers. By contrast, some characteristic styrene peaks (such as C 5 H 3 +, C 7 H 7 +, C 8 H 7 +, and C 8 H 9 + at m / z = 63, 91, 103, and 105, respectively) showed an absolute intensity higher than those observed for PSt and PMMA. In negative mode, fragments such as OH - and C 2 HO - at m / z = 17 and 41 exhibited linear dependence with styrene content at the surface. Intensities for other MMA characteristic fragments such as C 3 H 3 O -, C 4 H 5 O 2 -, C 8 H 13 O 2 -, and C 9 H 13 O 4 - at m / z = 55, 85, 141, and 185, respectively, strongly decreased with increasing styrene content. These experiments as well as previous work on polystyrenes show that specific interactions between adjacent species take place during secondary ion emission, especially for the C 7 H 7 + fragment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eynde et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: