Why the study?
CAD patients frequently experience depression and anxiety linked to cognitive decline and delirium, necessitating targeted interventions and standardized clinical care to improve prognosis.
This guideline update provides a standardized framework for managing patients with coronary artery disease complicated by psychological and cognitive conditions.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant global health burden, profoundly impacting both physical and mental well-being. Psychocardiology underscores the critical influence of psychological factors on the development, diagnosis, and management of cardiovascular diseases. Patients with CAD frequently experience high rates of depression and anxiety, which are closely linked to mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia, cognitive impairment, and delirium. Given that cognitive decline and delirium severely compromise patient prognosis, targeted interventions and standardized care are essential. To address these needs, the Psychocardiology Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association Beijing Branch and the Psychocardiology Education Professional Committee of China Medical Education Association, together with over 50 experts from 40 organizations, have developed these association standards (No. T/CAS 812-2024). This December 2025 update provides a refined framework for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CAD complicated by depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. These guidelines aim to direct standardized clinical practice and improve the overall physical and psychological prognosis for this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied Coronary artery disease complicated by depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. Clinical diagnosis and treatment guidelines was evaluated. The updated December 2025 guidelines provide a refined framework for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease complicated by depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: