Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Batefenterol is a novel bifunctional muscarinic antagonist β 2 -agonist in development for COPD. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator, Phase IIb study was to model the dose–response of batefenterol and select a dose for Phase III development. Patients and methods: Patients aged ≥40 years with COPD and FEV 1 ≥30% and ≤70% predicted normal were randomized equally to batefenterol 37.5, 75, 150, 300, or 600 µg, placebo, or umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg once daily. The primary and secondary endpoints were weighted-mean FEV 1 over 0–6 hours post-dose and trough FEV 1 , analyzed by Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation E max of dose–response modeling, respectively, on day 42. Results: In the intent-to-treat population (N=323), all batefenterol doses demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline vs placebo in the primary and secondary endpoints (191.1–292.8 and 182.2–244.8 mL, respectively), with a relatively flat dose–response. In the subgroup reversible to salbutamol, there were greater differences between batefenterol doses. Lung function improvements with batefenterol ≥150 µg were comparable with those with UMEC/VI. Batefenterol was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusion: Batefenterol 300 µg may represent the optimal dose for Phase III studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crim et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: