We report on the growth and properties of (Sr1−xCax)RuO3 and Sr (Ru1−xTix)O3 thin films obtained by sequential deposition of submonolayers from end members of each compound. Magnetization measurements as well as transport properties exhibit a very different behavior for each type of substitution. A simple model, which assumes a random distribution of the substituted sites, allows us to account quantitatively for the reduction of the magnetization with increased doping and further confirms the homogeneity of our samples. A strong distortion due to the presence of the Ti on the Ru site could explain the different behavior observed between both types of doping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miéville et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: