A simple derivation of the conduction-electron g factor in a crystal having inversion symmetry is presented. The result obtained for the g shift is unambiguous for each state (of wave vector k), and reduces to the correct isolated-atom g shift in the tight-binding limit. Previous work has failed to satisfy these requirements. Two formulas suitable for computation of δg(k) are derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graaf et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: