Key result
Temporarily switching from oral to intravenous selexipag was well-tolerated and resulted in comparable exposure to the active metabolite, with an AUC geometric mean ratio of 0.80.
Why the study?
Treatment interruptions in oral selexipag should be avoided in PAH, prompting development and evaluation of an IV formulation for temporary bridging.
Does temporarily switching from oral to intravenous selexipag maintain comparable active metabolite exposure with acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does temporarily switching from oral to intravenous selexipag maintain comparable active metabolite exposure with acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Effect estimate: Ratio of geometric means 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.90)
Intravenous selexipag provides comparable active metabolite exposure to oral selexipag and is well-tolerated, offering a feasible bridging option for temporary oral treatment interruptions in PAH patients.
May support temporary IV switch when oral selexipag is interrupted; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The oral IP receptor agonist selexipag is approved for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatment interruptions should be avoided due to the progressive nature of the disease. An intravenous (IV) formulation of selexipag was developed to provide a treatment option for short-term interruptions to oral selexipag. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study, the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of temporarily switching between oral and IV selexipag were investigated (NCT03187678, ClinicalTrials.gov). METHODS: PAH patients receiving stable oral selexipag doses were enrolled. Following three consecutive IV selexipag infusions patients resumed oral selexipag. Corresponding IV and oral doses were selected to achieve comparable exposure to the active metabolite of selexipag. Safety outcomes were monitored throughout, and pharmacokinetic samples were obtained after oral and IV administration. RESULTS: All 20 patients completed the study. Fifteen patients had adverse events (AEs), most were mild, and none resulted in discontinuation. Headache was the most common AE throughout the study (four patients). Three serious AEs occurred in two patients with underlying comorbidities when oral dosing had resumed. There were no changes in WHO functional class for any patient and no clinically symptomatic changes in blood pressure were observed. Comparable exposure to the active metabolite of selexipag was demonstrated following corresponding oral and IV selexipag doses. CONCLUSIONS: Temporarily switching between corresponding doses of oral and IV selexipag was well-tolerated with no unexpected safety findings and comparable exposure to the active metabolite. Treatment with IV selexipag is a feasible option to bridge temporary oral selexipag treatment interruptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klose et al. (2021) studied Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=20). Intravenous selexipag vs. Oral selexipag was evaluated on Pharmacokinetic exposure to the active metabolite (AUC τ,ss) (Ratio of geometric means 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90). Temporarily switching from oral to intravenous selexipag was well-tolerated and resulted in comparable exposure to the active metabolite, with an AUC geometric mean ratio of 0.80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: