Key result
Initial triple combination therapy benefits severe pulmonary arterial hypertension patients across ages, though its benefit in treatment-naïve, mild-to-moderate patients remains unestablished.
Initial triple combination therapy benefits severe PAH patients across ages, but its efficacy in treatment-naïve, mild-to-moderate PAH patients has not been established.
A rare condition in children and adults alike, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is progressive and carries a poor prognosis [1, 2]. Therapeutically, three pathways are being targeted to induce vasodilation, inhibit vascular proliferation and reduce the load on the right heart: the endothelin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin (PGI2) pathways [3]. Incident adult patients with severe PAH ( i.e. with a high, >10% risk of 1-year mortality) are preferably treated with a parenteral PGI2 analogue, while the double oral combination of a phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor and an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) is considered standard of care for most other patients with mild to moderate PAH [1, 2, 4]. On the basis of the landmark AMBITION trial [5], PDE-5 inhibitor/ERA combination treatment is preferably started right after diagnosis (initial combination therapy). One small retrospective study in treatment-naïve, incident patients with severe PAH suggested exceptional benefit from initial triple combination therapy, consisting of a PDE-5 inhibitor, an ERA and intravenous epoprostenol [6]. This result was recently confirmed in a similar observational study of severe incident PAH patients treated with a combination including the subcutaneous PGI2 analogue treprostinil [7]. The more recently developed prostacyclin receptor (IP) agonist selexipag was shown to improve outcomes in prevalent patients on initial mono- or combination therapy [8]. However, the benefit of initial triple combination therapy in treatment-naïve, mild-to-moderate PAH patients has not been established. Initial triple therapy benefits severe PAH patients across the ages
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogaard et al. (2021) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Initial triple combination therapy was evaluated. Initial triple combination therapy benefits severe pulmonary arterial hypertension patients across ages, though its benefit in treatment-naïve, mild-to-moderate patients remains unestablished.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: