Key result
The use of ERAS protocols for hysterectomy resulted in reduced length of stay without increasing rates of complications or readmissions compared to conventional care.
Why the study?
While ERAS pathways have shown positive effects across multiple surgical specialties, their impact in hysterectomy for benign conditions needed systematic review.
Do Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve clinical outcomes and reduce length of stay in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions?
Systematic Review (n=1,101)
Do Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve clinical outcomes and reduce length of stay in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions?
ERAS protocols for benign hysterectomy safely reduce length of stay and hospital costs without increasing complications or readmissions.
Supports ERAS adoption after hysterectomy; extends benefits seen in colorectal and other specialties.
Purpose: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based recovery programme that aids in the recovery time following major surgery to improve clinical outcomes while reducing demand on impatient beds. Previous studies from multiple specialities have demonstrated positive effects of ERAS, including colorectal, liver and pancreatic surgery with ERAS pathways becoming part of normal practice. The aim of this study was to systematically review the impact of ERAS in hysterectomy for benign conditions. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using CINAHL, EMBASE and PubMed using the search terms ‘Multi-modal’ or ‘fast track’ or ‘ERAS’ or ‘enhanced recovery’ or ‘same day discharge’ and ‘hysterectomy. In accordance with the PRISMA checklist, articles were selected for inclusion based on predetermined criteria, and a narrative synthesis was used to systematically review the selected articles. Results: Eight articles describing the use of ERAS protocols in hysterectomy for benign conditions were identified. Three were cohort studies, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two case-control studies. While there were no significant differences in postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, or readmissions between groups, length of stay and cost were both decreased in the ERAS groups. Conclusions: The use of ERAS protocols for hysterectomy resulted in reduced length of stay without increasing rates of complications or readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Sullivan et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Hysterectomy for benign conditions (n=1,101). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Conventional care was evaluated on Length of stay. The use of ERAS protocols for hysterectomy resulted in reduced length of stay without increasing rates of complications or readmissions compared to conventional care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: