Key result
Surgical ventricular restoration in unstable patients within 30 days of an anterior myocardial infarction was feasible, with an operative mortality of 5.4% and a 3-year survival rate of 87%.
Why the study?
Does surgical ventricular restoration improve early and late outcomes in unstable patients with recent anterior myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=74)
No
Does surgical ventricular restoration improve early and late outcomes in unstable patients with recent anterior myocardial infarction?
Surgical ventricular restoration is feasible and associated with acceptable early mortality and good 3-year survival in unstable patients within 30 days of an anterior myocardial infarction.
May support consideration in selected unstable patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice without randomized data.
BACKGROUND: The effects and efficacy of surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) in ischemic cardiomiopathy caused by chronic anterior myocardial infarction (MI) are well established. Normally, SVR is delayed at least 3 months after MI to allow the healing of infarcted tissue. Some patients have instability <30 days after anterior MI, with increased risk for morbidity and mortality.Objectives- This study tests the safety and efficacy of SVR in the setting of subacute complicated anterior MI, in terms of early and late outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: 74 patients (62+/-10 years) were submitted to SVR at < or =30 days after anterior MI for clinical instability and were retrospectively selected from a series of 430 patients undergoing SVR at our center, between 1998 and 2001. The surgical indications included: angina (60%); New York Heart Association class 4 (62%); clinical signs of heart failure (18%); life-threatening arrhythmias (12%); and cardiogenic shock in 4% (or 3) patients. Follow-up is available for 93% of patients. All patients had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (3.1+/-1.2) with internal mammary artery (IMA) utilization. An endoventricular patch was used in 17 patients (23%); direct ventriculotomy closure was used in the remaining patients. Operative mortality was 5.4% (4/74). Hemodynamic parameters improved significantly in patients with dilated hearts and reduced ejection fraction. Mitral regurgitation that resulted was significantly reduced. Survival at 3 years was 87% in the overall population and 85% in patients 70 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the largest series of patients with complicated, recent anterior MI treated with SVR. The results show that SVR is feasible, has acceptable in-hospital mortality, and has good early and late outcome. Further experience is needed to establish whether SVR, which excludes the infarcted region, can prevent the long-term adverse remodeling of LV dilated hearts after anterior infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donato et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Unstable patients with recent anterior myocardial infarction (n=74). Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) was evaluated on Operative mortality. Surgical ventricular restoration in unstable patients within 30 days of an anterior myocardial infarction was feasible, with an operative mortality of 5.4% and a 3-year survival rate of 87%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: