Key result
Under 1% of eligible HFrEF patients achieve target triple-therapy doses over 12 months.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend titration of medical therapy for HFrEF to target doses, but the degree to which titration occurs in contemporary US practice is unknown.
Population
2,588 US outpatients with chronic HFrEF in the CHAMP-HF registry without contraindications
Comparison
Longitudinal use and dosing changes of ACEI/ARB, ARNI, beta-blocker, and MRA
Design
Registry-based longitudinal observational study
Follow-up
12-month
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“This is the reality we live with in heart failure, without any meaningful outrage or accountability. Medical therapies that scaled a burden-of-proof barrier unprecedented in most disease states have invariably fallen flat in the implementation phase.”
“In the CHAMP-HF registry conducted in the United States, which included 2,588 patients with HFrEF who completed follow-up to 12 months, only 1.5% of patients were taking the stable target dose for 12 months.”
Target-dose GDMT remains rare in HFrEF outpatients; leaves open effective strategies to close the implementation gap.
Observational (n=2,588)
Yes
In contemporary US practice, the vast majority of eligible HFrEF patients do not achieve target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy over 12 months of follow-up, highlighting significant gaps in care optimization.
Greene et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=2,588). Guideline-directed medical therapy (ACEI/ARB, ARNI, beta-blocker, MRA) was evaluated on Longitudinal titration of HFrEF medical therapy (initiation/dosing increase or discontinuation/dosing decrease) at 12 months. Over 12 months of follow-up, less than 1% of eligible HFrEF patients were simultaneously treated with target doses of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, beta-blocker, and MRA, with few patients having doses increased over time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: