Stable isotope labeled (SIL) drug methods are compared with standard methods for performing early (phases I and IIa) drug development studies (mass balance, bioavailability, single-dose volunteer and patient, multiple-dose volunteer and patient). SIL methods offer considerable reduction in the cost (> 50%) and number of subjects (67%) required for bioavailability and multiple-dose patient studies. Moreover, a complete early drug development program is described for optimally combining SIL and standard studies, which can reduce cost by 23% and number of subjects by 36% compared with a program using standard methods. These reductions should result in development time savings of at least one year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas R. Browne (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: