We investigate the influence of nanofiller surface chemistry and ion content on the conductivity of nanofilled PEO + LiClO 4 solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) using dielectric spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), FESEM, and quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS). We consider the concentration series EO/Li = 8:1, 10:1 (eutectic composition), 14:1, with both acidic α-Al 2 O 3 and neutral γ-Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles. The acidic filler is more effective at increasing conductivity at the non- eutectic compositions. In contrast, the two surface chemistries provide comparable increases at the eutectic composition. This composition maximizes the influence of nanofillers, regardless of surface chemistry. We find no significant changes in crystallinity, glass transition temperature, nanoparticle dispersion, or PEO segmental dynamics as a function of surface chemistry. In the absence of salt, acidic particles slow PEO dynamics more than neutral particles, suggesting that the PEO chains and the acidic surface sites share a favorable interaction. A rotation consistent with the crystal structure PEO 6:LiClO 4 is observed up to 50 °C (8:1) and up to 75 °C (eutectic composition). PEO 6 rotation is hindered by nanoparticles, with the degree of restriction as a function of surface chemistry. We propose a mechanism where nanofillers stabilize the PEO 6 structure at their surface, and differences in surface chemistry and composition dictate the extent of stabilized PEO 6 and whether Li movement in this structure is facile or restricted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganapatibhotla et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: