Key result
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for the right coronary artery using the right gastroepiploic artery in four redo patients resulted in 100% graft patency and no cardiac events over a mean follow-up of 1.5 years.
Case Report (n=4)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MIDCAB using the RGEA via a subxiphoid incision is a feasible and safe technique for reoperative CABG targeting the right coronary artery.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been widely performed for coronary artery disease. Therefore, cases requiring reoperative CABG are increasing. We performed a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure on four patients, as reoperative CABG surgery for the right coronary artery (RCA), employing the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). The target sites were the distal RCA in two patients and the posterior descending (PD) branch in the other two. Complete revascularization was accomplished in all patients without sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), or blood transfusion. The mean operative time was 3.0 h (range: 2.4-3.7 h). Postoperative coronary angiography showed all grafts to be patent. All patients were discharged without postoperative complications and remained free from cardiac events during a mean follow-up period of 1.5 years (range: 0.5-3.0 years). MIDCAB for the RCA, employing the RGEA via a subxiphoid incision showed, excellent revascularization in redo CABG cases. This technique is a safe and effective method for redo cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Coronary artery disease requiring redo CABG (n=4). Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) was evaluated on Graft patency and freedom from cardiac events. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for the right coronary artery using the right gastroepiploic artery in four redo patients resulted in 100% graft patency and no cardiac events over a mean follow-up of 1.5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: