Key result
External fixation in high-risk older patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures resulted in a 50% complication rate and a 23.1% revision rate, leading the authors to recommend against its use.
Why the study?
Does external fixation provide safe and effective treatment for high-risk older patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures?
Observational (n=26)
No
Does external fixation provide safe and effective treatment for high-risk older patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures?
External fixation for intertrochanteric femur fractures in high-risk older patients is associated with unacceptably high rates of mechanical complications and revision surgeries.
High complication rates caution against external fixation in frail elderly patients; Level 5 data leaves open any comparative role versus internal fixation.
Background: Intertrochanteric femur fractures are common in older people.In high-risk patients, especially American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores 3 and 4, surgery with internal fixation can cause excessive stresses.Therefore, external fixation is another option for treating these patients.Objective: To evaluate the results and complications of external fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.Methods: Twenty-six surgically high-risk patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted to our clinic were treated with external fixation (January 2010-November 2011).Epidemiological and radiological data and also complications were recorded at each follow-up.Results: No complications occurred in 13 patients.The remaining 13 patients had complications after surgery: Of the patients, 10 had implant failure (6 pin migration and 4 pin cut-out) and 3 had pin tract infections.Six patients who had implant failure (2 pin migration and 4 pin cut-out) underwent revision.Unrevised complicated patients (4 pin migration) and 2 of 3 patients with pin tract infections had malunion and shortening.High risk older patients with external fixation had a high complication and morbidity rate. Conclusion:We do not recommend using pertrochanteric external fixators in high-risk patients due to the high revision rate and serious complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erkan Alkan Fatih Karaaslan (2014) conducted an observational in Intertrochanteric femur fractures (n=26). External fixation was evaluated on Complications (including implant failure and pin tract infections). External fixation in high-risk older patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures resulted in a 50% complication rate and a 23.1% revision rate, leading the authors to recommend against its use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: