Key result
Anti-p155/140 autoantibody was associated with significantly decreased nailfold capillary end row loops (P=0.006) but not generalized lipodystrophy in children with juvenile dermatomyositis.
Why the study?
Myositis-specific antibodies help group children with juvenile dermatomyositis into distinct phenotypes, prompting investigation into whether anti-p155/140 is linked to lipodystrophy and nailfold capillary damage.
Does anti-p155/140 autoantibody positivity associate with lipodystrophy or loss of nailfold capillaries in children with juvenile dermatomyositis?
Cohort (n=96)
Does anti-p155/140 autoantibody positivity associate with lipodystrophy or loss of nailfold capillaries in children with juvenile dermatomyositis?
In children with juvenile dermatomyositis, anti-p155/140 autoantibodies are associated with greater loss of nailfold capillaries but not with generalized lipodystrophy.
Anti-p155/140 positivity was associated with greater nailfold capillary loss but not lipodystrophy; leaves open vascular phenotyping and monitoring needs in juvenile DM.
OBJECTIVE: Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) facilitate grouping children with juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) into distinct phenotypes. The first aim of this study was to investigate the link between anti-p155/140 and lipodystrophy as determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessment of fat distribution. The second aim was to examine the relationship between anti-p155/140 and damage to the nailfold capillary system. METHODS: Children with juvenile DM followed for a minimum of 5 years were included. The study population was divided into 3 groups (anti-p155/140, other MSA, and MSA negative). Lipodystrophy was assessed by physician assessment and DXA fat distribution (trunk-to-leg fat ratio). Documentation of nailfold capillary end row loops (ERLs) was obtained at diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 96 subjects (44% anti-p155/140, 23% other MSA, 33% MSA negative) were included. There was no significant difference in age, disease activity scores, or lipodystrophy between the 3 groups. The trunk-to-leg fat ratios were similar among the 3 groups at different time points. However, the anti-p155/140 group had significantly decreased ERL counts (P = 0.006) at baseline as well as a prolonged duration of untreated disease at diagnosis (P = 0.027). Also, the anti-p155/140 group had fewer patients with a monophasic disease course than the other 2 groups (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Generalized lipodystrophy frequency was equivalent in all 3 groups based on physician assessments and trunk-to-leg fat ratios. The anti-p155/140 group had a greater loss of ERLs, suggesting that this MSA may impact the vascular component of juvenile DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khojah et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in juvenile dermatomyositis (n=96). anti-p155/140 autoantibody vs. other MSA and MSA negative was evaluated on lipodystrophy and nailfold capillary end row loops (ERLs) (p=0.006). Anti-p155/140 autoantibody was associated with significantly decreased nailfold capillary end row loops (P=0.006) but not generalized lipodystrophy in children with juvenile dermatomyositis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: