For each of the two models of a sparse random graph on n vertices, G(n, # of edges = cn/2) and G(n, Prob (edge) = c/n) define tn(k) as the total number of tree components of size k (1 ≤ k ≤ n). the random sequence {[tn(k) ‐ nh(k)]n−1/2} is shown to be Gaussian in the limit n →∞, with h(k) = kk−2ck−1e−kc/k! and covariance function being dependent upon the model. This general result implies, in particular, that, for c> 1, the size of the giant component is asymptotically Gaussian, with mean nθ(c) and variance n(1 − T)−2(1 − 2Tθ)θ(1 − θ) for the first model and n(1 − T)−2θ(1 − θ) for the second model. Here Te−T = ce−c, T<1, and θ = 1 − T/c. A close technique allows us to prove that, for c < 1, the independence number of G(n, p = c/n) is asymptotically Gaussian with mean nc−1(β + β2/2) and variance n[c−1(β + β2/2) −c−2(c + 1)β2], where βeβ = c. It is also proven that almost surely the giant component consists of a giant two‐connected core of size about n(1 − T)β and a “mantle” of trees, and possibly few small unicyclic graphs, each sprouting from its own vertex of the core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boris Pittel (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: