Key result
A proposed method for estimating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with differentially censored data was evaluated and applied to a trial of implanted defibrillators versus conventional therapy.
Why the study?
How can incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and their confidence intervals be estimated when differential censoring exists for cost and survival data?
How can incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and their confidence intervals be estimated when differential censoring exists for cost and survival data?
This paper provides a novel statistical methodology for accurately estimating cost-effectiveness in clinical trials where cost and survival data have different censoring times.
May enable reliable ICER estimation despite differential censoring; extends methods for cost-effectiveness analyses in trials with censored data.
With medical costs escalating over recent years, cost analysis is being conducted more and more to assess economic impact of new treatment options. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is a measure that assesses the additional cost for a new treatment for each additional unit of effectiveness, such as saving 1 year of life. In this article, we consider cost-effectiveness analysis for new treatments evaluated in a randomized clinical trial setting with staggered entries. In particular, the censoring times are different for cost and survival data. We propose a method for estimating the ICER and obtaining its confidence interval when differential censoring exists. Simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate our proposed method. We also apply our methods to a clinical trial example comparing the cost-effectiveness of implanted defibrillators with conventional therapy for individuals with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2006) studied Reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Implanted defibrillators vs. Conventional therapy was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A proposed method for estimating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with differentially censored data was evaluated and applied to a trial of implanted defibrillators versus conventional therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: