The magnitude of weight gained following the weight-in (RWG) among NCAA Division I wrestling competitors was the focus of previous studies. The RWG was considered to be the result of rapid weight reduction prior to the weigh-in (RWR), competitive level (NCAA Division), and lack of assessment of competitors for appropriate weight classes. In 1998, the NCAA adopted new rules intended to dissuade RWR and RWG. Previous studies revealed a significant decrease (p≤.01) in RWG from 2.66 kg in 1992 to 0.66 kg in 1999. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to compare both RWR (over the ∼20 h prior to the weigh-in) and RWG (over the ∼10h period following the weigh-in) among NCAA Divisions (DI, DII, & DIII). METHODS: The RWR and RWG values across the various Divisions were measured utilizing the official scales at each NCAA National Wrestling Toumament. RESULTS: RWR and RWG (Mean ± SD) (excluding the heavyweight classes) follows:Table: No Captionl Available.There were no significant differences (p > .05) between the three NCAA Divisions for RWR or RWG. The variances observed in all Divisions demonstrated that ∼19% of the wrestlers still underwent RWR or RWG of ∼0.92 kg. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the continued impact of the NCAA Wrestling Weight Monitoring Program in dissuading RWR and RWG and requiring assessment of wrestlers for appropriate weight classes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: