Key result
In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and high pVEGFR2/KDR+ vascular density, adding vatalanib to chemotherapy significantly increased the response rate from 15% to 50%.
Why the study?
Does vatalanib added to chemotherapy improve progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by vascular density?
Observational (n=141)
Single-blind
Yes
Does vatalanib added to chemotherapy improve progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by vascular density?
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 15%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 35%
p-value: p=0.02
Assessment of activated vessel density (pVEGFR2/KDR+) may identify a subgroup of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who benefit from the addition of vatalanib to chemotherapy.
Supports pVEGFR2/KDR+ stratification for vatalanib response in mCRC; leaves open survival benefit in trials.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacological inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, like vatalanib, have been tested in randomised trials (CONFIRM (Colorectal Oral Novel therapy For the Inhibition of Angiogenesis and Retarding of Metastases) 1 and 2) in colorectal cancer showing activity in a subgroup of patients with high serum LDH expression. In the current study, we assessed the predictive role of vascular density (VD) in patients treated in the above trials. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded materials from 141 patients were analysed with immunohistochemistry for the expression of the CD31 (pan-endothelial cell marker) and of phosphorylated pVEGFR2/KDR on endothelial cells. The VD was correlated with response to therapy and with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A significant association of pVEGFR2/KDR+ VD with poor response in the placebo group was noted (response rates (RRs) 15% (3/20) when high VD vs 52% (26/50) when low VD; P=0.006). The RR increased from 15 (3/20) to 50% (11/22) in tumours with high VD when vatalanib was added to chemotherapy (P=0.02). A significantly improved PFS was noted in patients with high pVEGFR2/KDR+ VD when treated with vatalanib (P=0.002). A similar effect was also noted in patients with high CD31+ VD (P=0.07). Overall survival was marginally improved (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Assessment of the activated vessel density may allow the stratification of patients recruited in randomised trials with VEGFR-targeting anti-angiogenic agents, unmasking their therapeutic potential and enabling their introduction in the clinical practice for the benefit of specific patient subgroups, at the same time reducing the cost of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giatromanolaki et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Metastatic colorectal cancer (n=141). Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK222584) plus FOLFOX4 vs. Placebo plus FOLFOX4 was evaluated on Response rate in patients with high pVEGFR2/KDR+ vascular density (p=0.02). In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and high pVEGFR2/KDR+ vascular density, adding vatalanib to chemotherapy significantly increased the response rate from 15% to 50%.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: