Intensified human‐derived nitrogen (N) loading may induce extensive phosphorus (P) uptake limitations in temperate forests. It remains unclear how plants will acclimate to such progressively deprived P environments under N input, especially in terms of adjustments in root P‐acquisition strategies. Here, we show, conducting N input experiments in two temperate forests (natural and secondary forest), that low, medium and high N inputs reduced plant‐available soil P concentrations by 9.3%, 15.7% and 16.3% in natural forests, and by 29.0%, 31.0% and 28.2% in secondary forests, respectively. This suggested that the natural forest had a stronger buffering capacity for N inputs, consequently resulting in a relatively lower impact on soil P availability. Importantly, continuous N input stepwise altered the P‐acquisition strategy of temperate forest plant roots. This transition moved from an initial dependence on mycorrhizal symbiosis for soil P acquisition to the mobilization of soil inorganic P by root‐released carboxylates, and ultimately to the inorganic P acquisition through the facilitation of the mineralization of organic P by rhizosheath phosphatases and by the enhancement of the ability of roots to scavenge the soil matrix. Simultaneously, plant rhizosheath phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase and phytase activities responded divergently to declined soil P availability, suggesting that increased N inputs altered plant mineralization preference and strategy for soil organic P with different chemical forms. Synthesis . These shifts in root P‐acquisition strategy reveal the adaptive strategies adopted by plants when soil P becomes increasingly limiting, also reflecting the profound effects of N inputs on plant allocation of below‐ground carbon (C) resources. Together, this study elucidated that N inputs remodelled C‐P coupling in temperate forests by altering root plasticity and C‐investment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: