Key result
The CONUT score significantly predicted complications other than true flap loss in microvascular flap surgery with an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI 0.659-0.967; p=0.012).
Why the study?
Data on laboratory biomarkers for predicting flap loss in microvascular flap surgery are limited, despite known risk factors for flap complications.
Does the preoperative CONUT score predict complications in adult patients undergoing elective microvascular flap surgery?
Cohort (n=72)
Does the preoperative CONUT score predict complications in adult patients undergoing elective microvascular flap surgery?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.813 (95% CI 0.659-0.967)
p-value: p=0.012
The preoperative CONUT score demonstrates considerable predictive value for postoperative complications in patients undergoing microvascular flap surgery.
CONUT >2 may flag higher non-vascular flap complication risk; leaves open whether nutritional optimization alters outcomes in microvascular surgery.
Microvascular flap surgery is a widely acknowledged procedure for significant defect reconstruction. Multiple flap complication risk factors have been identified, yet there are limited data on laboratory biomarkers for the prediction of flap loss. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has demonstrated good postoperative outcome assessment ability in diverse surgical populations. We aim to assess the predictive value of the CONUT score for complications in microvascular flap surgery. This prospective cohort study includes 72 adult patients undergoing elective microvascular flap surgery. Preoperative blood draws for analysis of full blood count, total plasma cholesterol, and albumin concentrations were collected on the day of surgery before crystalloid infusion. Postoperative data on flap complications and duration of hospitalization were obtained. The overall complication rate was 15.2%. True flap loss with vascular compromise occurred in 5.6%. No differences in flap complications were found between different areas of reconstruction, anatomical flap types, or indications for surgery. Obesity was more common in patients with flap complications (p = 0.01). The CONUT score had an AUC of 0.813 (0.659–0.967, p = 0.012) for predicting complications other than true flap loss due to vascular compromise. A CONUT score > 2 was indicated as optimal during cut-off analysis (p = 0.022). Patients with flap complications had a longer duration of hospitalization (13.55, 10.99–16.11 vs. 25.38, 14.82–35.93; p = 0.004). Our findings indicate that the CONUT score has considerable predictive value in microvascular flap surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocans et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Elective microvascular flap surgery (n=72). Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score was evaluated on Complications other than true flap loss due to vascular compromise (AUC 0.813, 95% CI 0.659-0.967, p=0.012). The CONUT score significantly predicted complications other than true flap loss in microvascular flap surgery with an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI 0.659-0.967; p=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: