The study aims to develop a foundation for determining when a depth-averaged two-dimensional model is sufficient for simulating hydrodynamic processes in shallow water bodies, such as the Sea of Azov, and when a three-dimensional model is advisable to achieve satisfactory results. It is shown that certain combinations of relatively high velocities ( $$u > 1$$ m/s) and water depths ( $$d > 50$$ m) can lead to significant differences between results obtained with two-dimensional and three-dimensional models. The findings are validated by numerical modeling of steady and unsteady periodic flows in a schematic rectangular basin. The results obtained with the three-dimensional and two-dimensional models are compared, with both cases showing agreement with analytical solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukhinov et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: