Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Persistent trophoblast is a recognised complication of salpingostomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, with reported rates of 3-20%; hence, women are advised to have serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels monitored post-operatively. Although much less common, there are also reports of disseminated trophoblastic peritoneal implants after laparoscopic salpingectomy. The aim of this study was to assess whether monitoring of post-operative serum hCG levels is necessary in women undergoing salpingectomy, where intra-operative spillage of trophoblast is thought to have occurred. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women who underwent serum hCG follow-up after salpingectomy. Serum hCG levels were monitored if: (1) the ectopic pregnancy was found to be ruptured; (2) there was a significant haemoperitoneum (>500 ml); (3) there was thought to be spillage of trophoblast at the time of salpingectomy or (4) a tubal miscarriage was diagnosed. Serum hCG levels were taken at days 1-2, days 3-4, days 6-8 or days 13-15 post-surgery. Women were followed up until the serum hCG level was <15 IU/l. Persistent trophoblast was defined as a failure of the serum hCG level to decrease spontaneously after surgery. RESULTS: 105 women underwent serum hCG follow-up after a laparoscopy for a tubal ectopic pregnancy. Of these women, 92 had a laparoscopic salpingectomy and 13 were diagnosed with a tubal miscarriage at the time of laparoscopy. In all women the serum hCG decreased spontaneously. CONCLUSION: It does not appear necessary to routinely monitor serum hCG levels post-operatively in women diagnosed with tubal miscarriages, in those undergoing salpingectomy for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy or in cases of salpingectomy, where there is thought to be spillage of trophoblast.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bora et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: