Key result
Early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia during open esophagectomy tended to increase the incidence of mesenteric traction syndrome compared to late activation (52% vs 25%, p=0.08).
Why the study?
Mesenteric traction syndrome is elicited by prostacyclin-induced vasodilation and causes facial flushing, tachycardia, and hypotension during abdominal surgery, but whether thoracic epidural anesthesia influences its incidence was unknown.
Does early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia reduce the incidence of mesenteric traction syndrome in patients undergoing open esophagectomy?
RCT (n=45)
Blinded
Randomized
No
Does early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia reduce the incidence of mesenteric traction syndrome in patients undergoing open esophagectomy?
Early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia during open esophagectomy does not prevent mesenteric traction syndrome and increases the risk of hypotension requiring vasopressor support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early thoracic epidural activation fails to reduce mesenteric traction syndrome and risks more hypotension; challenges early-use assumptions and leaves optimal timing unresolved.
Objective: A mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is elicited by prostacyclin (PGI 2 )-induced vasodilation and identified by facial flushing, tachycardia, and hypotension during abdominal surgery. We evaluated whether thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) influences the incidence of MTS. Design: Randomized, blinded controlled trial. Setting: Single-center university hospital. Participants: Fifty patients undergoing open esophagectomy. Interventions: Patients were randomized to either early (EA, after induction of general anesthesia) or late activation of TEA (LA, after re-established gastric continuity). Plasma 6-keto-PGF 1α , a stable metabolite of PGI 2 and interleukine-6 (IL6) were measured in plasma during surgery along with hemodynamic variables and MTS graded according to facial flushing together with plasma C-reactive protein on the third post-operative day. Results: Forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Development of MTS tended to be more prevalent with EA (n=13/25 [52%]) than with LA TEA (n=5/20 [25%], p=0.08). For patients who developed MTS, there was a transient increase in plasma 6-keto-PGF 1α by 15 min of surgery and plasma IL6 (p< 0.001) as C-reactive protein (P< 0.009) increased. EA TEA influenced the amount of phenylephrine needed to maintain mean arterial pressure > 60 mmHg in patients who developed MTS (0.16 [0.016– 0.019] mg/min vs MTS and LA TEA 0.000 [0.000– 0.005] mg/min, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of MTS is not prevented by TEA in patients undergoing open esophagectomy. On the contrary, the risk of hypotension is increased in patients exposed to TEA during surgery, and the results suggest that it is advantageous to delay activation of TEA. Also, MTS seems to be associated with a systemic inflammatory response, maybe explaining the aggravated post-operative outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strandby et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Open esophagectomy (n=45). Early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) vs. Late activation of TEA was evaluated on Development of mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) (p=0.08). Early activation of thoracic epidural anesthesia during open esophagectomy tended to increase the incidence of mesenteric traction syndrome compared to late activation (52% vs 25%, p=0.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: