Herein reported is the impact of the functionalization of four different semiconducting polymer structures by a linear siloxane‐terminated side‐chains. The latter is tetrasiloxane (Si 4 ) or trisiloxane (Si 3 ) chains, substituted at their extremity to a pentylene linker. The polymer structure is based on 5,6‐difluorobenzothiadiazole comonomer (PF2), a diketopyrrolopyrrole unit (PDPP‐TT), a naphtalediimide unit (PNDI‐T 2 ), and a poly[bis(thiophen‐2‐yl)thieno[3,2,b]thiophene (PBTTT). The properties of these siloxane‐functionalized polymers are scrutinized and compared with the ones of their alkyl‐substituted polymer analogues. The impact of the alkyl‐to‐siloxane chain substitution clearly depends on the molecular section of the side chains. When a branched 2‐octyldodecyl chain (C 20 ) is replaced by a Si 4 chain of same molecular section, the greatest impact is the strong increase of the π‐stacking overlap of the polymer backbones. This effect leads to a significative enhancement of the charge mobility values of the polymers. As in‐plane and out‐of‐plane mobility are increased simultaneously, this π‐overlap enhancement effect happens to be preponderant over the polymer orientation variations. When a linear tetradecyl chain (C 14 ) is replaced by a linear Si 3 chain of twice larger molecular section, the polymer structure is profoundly affected. While PBTTT‐C 14 is crystalline and purely edge‐on, PBTTT‐Si 3 is mesomorphic and shows a mixed face‐on/edge‐on orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narayanaswamy et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: