Key result
Elevated serum biomarkers increased the risk for death (overall 5.8 per 100 person-years) but poorly predicted the likelihood of an appropriate ICD shock (overall 3.2 per 100 person-years).
Why the study?
Do serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and cardiac injury predict appropriate shocks and all-cause mortality in patients with primary prevention ICDs?
Observational (n=1,189)
Do serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and cardiac injury predict appropriate shocks and all-cause mortality in patients with primary prevention ICDs?
A combination of 5 serum biomarkers can identify patients with systolic heart failure who are at high risk of death but unlikely to receive an appropriate ICD shock, potentially refining primary prevention ICD patient selection.
Biomarkers may identify high-mortality patients unlikely to receive ICD shocks; leaves open their role in refining primary prevention selection.
BACKGROUND: Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce all-cause mortality, but the benefits are heterogeneous. Current risk stratification based on left ventricular ejection fraction has limited discrimination power. We hypothesize that biomarkers for inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and cardiac injury can predict appropriate shocks and all-cause mortality in patients with primary prevention ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSe-ICD) enrolled 1189 patients with systolic heart failure who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The primary end point was an ICD shock for adjudicated ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. After a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 137 subjects experienced an appropriate ICD shock and 343 participants died (incidence rates of 3.2 and 5.8 per 100 person-years, respectively). In multivariable-adjusted models, higher interleukin-6 levels increased the risk of appropriate ICD shocks. In contrast, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II, pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), and cardiac troponin T showed significant linear trends for increased risk of all-cause mortality across quartiles. A score combining these 5 biomarkers identified patients who were much more likely to die than to receive an appropriate shock from the ICD. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and myocardial injury increased the risk for death but poorly predicted the likelihood of an ICD shock. These findings highlight the potential importance of serum-based biomarkers in identifying patients who are unlikely to benefit from primary prevention ICDs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00733590.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Systolic heart failure (n=1,189). Serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and myocardial injury was evaluated on ICD shock for adjudicated ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Elevated serum biomarkers increased the risk for death (overall 5.8 per 100 person-years) but poorly predicted the likelihood of an appropriate ICD shock (overall 3.2 per 100 person-years).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: