A systematic computational study of the gas-phase adsorption of different amino-acid-analogues (AA-an’s) on a (6,0) boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) and on a boron nitride monolayer (BNML) has been performed by means of B3LYP-D2* periodic calculations. The AA-an’s are CH 3 -R molecules, where R represents functional groups present in amino acid side chains, i.e., OH, COOH, CONH 2, NH 2, imidazole, guanidine, phenyl, phenol, indole, and CONHCH 3 . On (6,0) BNNT, AA-an species containing N electron donor groups (i.e., R = NH 2, imidazole, and guanidine) are strongly chemisorbed through dative interactions between the N atom of the AA-an and a B atom of the nanotube and present the largest adsorption energies (Δ E ads ). For AA-an bearing aromatic rings (i.e., R = phenyl, phenol and indole) and R = CONHCH 3, adsorption is driven by π-stacking interactions (with lower Δ E ads values than the previous group), while for AA-an with O electron donor groups and H-bonding donor groups (i.e., R = OH, COOH, and CONH 2 ) adsorption is dictated by dispersion of moderate strength alongside weak dative and H-bond interactions, thus presenting the lowest Δ E ads . Significant differences are found on BNMLs. All adducts form by means of dispersion interactions of a different nature. The most stable adducts are those establishing π-stacking interactions, in which the π-systems of the AA-an’s are aromatic rings (i.e., R = phenyl, phenol, indole, and imidazole). The AA-an group presenting the second most favorable Δ E ads also presents π-stacking interactions, but the π-system is a single double-bond (i.e., R = COOH, CONH 2, guanidine, and CONHCH 3 ), whereas for R = NH 2 and OH adsorption is due to CH−π interactions. On the basis of the computed adsorption energies, intrinsic affinity scales of the considered AA-an’s for BN nanomaterials are proposed, which can give hints about those lateral chains responsible for the protein/BN nanomaterial interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albert Rimola (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: