Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reactions of three different tetracoordinated Ir complexes, [Ir(troppph)2]n (n=+1, 0, −1), which differ in the formal oxidation state of the metal from +1 to −1, with proton sources and dihydrogen were investigated (tropp=5-(diphenylphosphanyl)dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptene). It was found that the cationic 16-electron complex [Ir(troppph)2]+ (2) cannot be protonated but reacts with NaBH4 to the very stable 18-electron IrI hydride [IrH(troppph)2] (5), which is further protonated with medium strong acids to give the 18-electron IrIII dihydride [IrH2(troppph)2]+ (6; pKs in CH2Cl2/THF/H2O 1 : 1 : 2 ca. 2.2). Both, the neutral 17-electron Ir0 complex [Ir(troppph)2] (3) and the anionic 18-electron complex [Ir(troppph)2]− (4) react rapidly with H2O to give the monohydride 5. In reactions of 3 with H2O, the terminal IrI hydroxide [Ir(OH)(troppph)2] (8) is formed in equal amounts. All these complexes, apart from 5, which is inert, do react rapidly with dihydrogen. The complex 2 gives the dihydride 6 in an oxidative addition reaction, while 3, 4, and 8 give the monohydride 5. Interestingly, a salt-type hydride (i.e., LiH) is formed as further product in the unexpected reaction with [Li(thf)x]+[Ir(troppph)2]− (4). Because 3 undergoes disproportionation into 2 and 4 according to 2 3⇄2+4 (Kdisp=2.7⋅10−5), it is likely that actually the diamagnetic species and not the odd-electron complex 3 is involved in the reactions studied here, and possible mechanisms for these are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böhler et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: