This study estimates the responsiveness of Korean aid to recipient countries' socio‐economic development needs and the strategic and commercial interests of Korea, with implications for other emerging and Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors. For this purpose, fixed effects regression models are used for the allocation of aid by the Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) to 157 recipient countries over the period 2004–2008. The results contrast sharply with the trend seen in DAC member countries. KOICA's aid allocations are consistent with neither socio‐economic development and poverty‐reduction objectives of aid, nor much of the strategic and commercial interests of Korea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kye Woo Lee (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: